Thoughts on Election (Part 2): Reprobation
Nov 7th, 2007 by admin
What is reprobation?
Reprobation refers to the ‘other side’ of election, if God elects some, He condemns others. Desiring God Ministries describes reprobation this way:
Just as God chooses whom He will save without regard to any distinctives in the person (Ephesians 1:5-6; Acts 13:48; Revelation 17:8), so also he decides whom He will not save without regard to any distinctives in the individual (John 10:26; 12:37-40; Romans 9:11-18; 1 Peter 2:7-8). By definition, the decision to elect some individuals to salvation necessarily implies the decision not to save those that were not chosen. God ordains not only that some will be rescued from his judgment, but that others will undergo that judgment. This does not mean that someone might really want to be saved but then be rejected because they are on the wrong list. Rather, we are all dead in sin and unwilling to seek God on our own. A true, genuine desire for salvation in Christ is in fact a mark of election, and therefore none who truly come to Christ for salvation will be turned away (John 6:37-40).
So just as God doesn’t choose to save certain people because they are better than others (unconditional election), neither does he choose not to save certain people because they are worse than others (unconditional reprobation, or double predestination). Rather, everybody is lost in sin and no one has anything to recommend them to God above anyone else. And so from this mass of fallen humanity, God chooses to redeem some and leave others.
Is reprobation predetermined?
Scripture seems to teach that not only is God sovereign over those who do trust in Christ, but also those who will not trust in Him. However, it would be a mistake to assume that such people are deserved of God’s grace. Paul’s words still hold true, “None is righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10). The fact that God saves anyone is still a wondrous work.
Robert Peterson (Election and Free Will, (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2007) gives three reasons why people are condemned according to Scripture: 1) Because of the responsibility of their own sins, 2) Because of their sin inherited from Adam, and 3) Because God has passed over them (reprobation). These three factors are biblically supported and each contribute to the condemnation of sinners. Peterson states: “The order, from least to greatest ultimacy, is: actual sin, original sin, and reprobation. It is vital to understand that the Bible gives these three reasons why people perish and does not regard any one of them as canceling out the others. To be faithful to Scriptures, we must do the same.” (p. 142)
Here are the texts that Peterson lists that support the three factors leading to condemnation:
Actual Sin
As the Lord of hosts purposed to deal with us for our ways and deeds, so has he dealt with us. (Zech 1:6b)
Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment. (John 5:28-29)
But for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. 9 There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek. (Rom 2:8-9)
Other texts: 1 Cor 4:5; Matt 12:36; Rev 20:12-13
Original Sin
But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. 16 And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. 17 For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. 19 For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous. (Romans 5:15-19)
Reprobation
Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in my Father’s name bear witness about me, 26 but you do not believe because you are not part of my flock. 27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. 28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. (John 10:25-28)
So the honor is for you who believe, but for those who do not believe, “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone,” 8 and “A stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense.” They stumble because they disobey the word, as they were destined to do. (1 Pet 2:7-8)
Other Texts: Rev 20:11-15
Is reprobation fair?
It seems quite clear that Scripture teaches that reprobation is an act of God. But the more difficult question to answer is, “Is reprobation fair?” My only answer to this question is one that probably will satisfy few, but it is the only answer that Scripture brings to bear. It is fair simply because God is the One who brings it to pass. And assuming that God is perfectly good, righteous, loving, and perfect, there could be no way that any act of His could be unfair. I have tried to argue this case in my previous post.
Also, I would add that there will be and always must be a sense of mystery in the tension of God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. Peterson adds: “Scripture affirms both absolute divine sovereignty and genuine responsibility; in fact, it puts them together in many passages. God thus invites us to hold his sovereignty and our accountability in tension. We affirm them both and sharpen our understanding by rejecting fatalism and absolute power to the contrary (creatures can frustrate the will of the creator) because both conflict with the Bible’s presentation of God and his people in covenant.” (p. 153) Isaiah 55:8-9 must be a grid upon which we understand the nature and character of God. To figure Him out would assume that somehow our minds equals God’s understanding of the world. The Tower of Babel story illustrates how this can be a tenuous task at best.
- Another Night of Romans 9 and the Will
- Thoughts on Election (Part 4): Election and Sanctification
- Thoughts on Election (Part 1): Romans 9
- Watch This Now During This Election Season
- John MacArthur, the Calvinist

thanks sam….lots of good stuff here…grudem’s “systematic theology” also makes a reference to the book of jude, which i thought was a NT “gem” on this topic…
another section from grudem (p. 686):
“We must also remember that there are important differences between election and reprobation as they are presented in the Bible. Election to salvation is viewed as a cause for rejoicing and praising to God, who is worthy of praise and receives all the credit for our salvation (see Eph 1:3-6; 1 Pet 1:1-3) God is viewed as actively choosing us for salvation, and doing so in love and with delight. But reprobation is viewed as something that brings God sorrow, not delight (see Ezek 33:11), and the blame for the condemnation of sinners is always put on the people or angels who rebel, never on God himself (see John 3:18-19, 5:40).”
psalm 136 should remind us that God is love…it is the human heart that clings to a sense of entitlement of our own lives and the eternal destinies of our souls, that finds fault in the idea of reprobation…we/i tend to view God as somehow cruel and unjust to “deny” some people access into the gates of heaven…and i think ultimately, for the believer, election/reprobation shouldn’t be viewed simply as whether someone makes it heaven or not (even though that is the reality of God’s calling and our final destination), but rather, how one responds to the message of the gospel in this life that we are given on earth…the two criminals on the crosses next to Christ might be a good example…although one of the two criminals was elected for salvation by the Almighty Creator before the beginning of the world, it wasn’t until the day of his funeral that he was saved…he spent his entire life trampling on the glory of God…that is not how i would want to approach the throne of grace at the end of my earthly life…God is love, and his love and mercy and grace have rescued me from myself…i want/need to embrace that whole-heartedly today and everyday…i am incrementally understanding that his love and mercy and grace (and justice and power and glory…) can be best understood and displayed when not everyone is elected to salvation…if Christ promised both criminals that they would be with Him in paradise, there would be something fundamentally wrong with the message of the gospel…
Sam and Charlie - AW Pink is good on this, too.
i didn’t intend to make it sound like the criminal that did receive Jesus’ invitation did NOT deserve it…or that somehow God let him narrowly slide into heaven…of course, NO ONE deserves such mercy…i think there is much to be said about the glory of God through the two criminals…(for some reason, i wanted to add that in as i read my previous comment
i think it would be humbling to seek out the criminal in heaven and see how passionately he is worshipping God
Charlie, I just read your posts again. Thanks for sharing! Also, the quote from Grudem/ST is excellent.
Thanks so much Charlie for your thoughts. I hope my latest post on sanctification touched on some of the things you are reflecting on. Grudem’s quote helps much. We must always remember that reprobation does not cause God to rejoice. (However, some of Edwards’ disciples used to teach that God is glorified through hell and reprobation which is a whole other discussion.)
I think we must never lose sight of what Peterson calls “double agency” with what he would call and order of ultimacy. Scripture teaches God’s sovereignty fully and completely. Scripture also teaches human responsibility. In this sense there are two agents, God and man. Both are concurrent, and both respond. However, there is an order of ultimacy (which would protect against synergism (dual-action of God and man needed for salvation)). God is ultimate and man is pen-ultimate. How this all fits perfectly together must rest in the mystery of God (Isa 55:8-9). To ‘figure this out’ perfectly would be like figuring out the Trinity perfectly or the incarnation perfectly. We are told Scriptural truths that God has given to us and we’re asked to believe them, to do what we can to understand them in light of our finiteness, but in the end we some things must be left to God (Paul’s potter and clay argument in Romans 9). Without this leaving to God, we would be like God (the Tower of Babel hubris).
I will try to summarize AWP soon. His book, _The Sovereignty of God_, was on Jerry Bridge’s Top-3 list. If you get this book, make sure you get the best edition, which is the one published by Baker.