<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Election (Part 2): Reprobation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TimK</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44378</link>
		<dc:creator>TimK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44378</guid>
		<description>I will try to summarize AWP soon. His book, _The Sovereignty of God_, was on Jerry Bridge's Top-3 list. If you get this book, make sure you get the best edition, which is the one published by Baker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will try to summarize AWP soon. His book, _The Sovereignty of God_, was on Jerry Bridge&#8217;s Top-3 list. If you get this book, make sure you get the best edition, which is the one published by Baker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44377</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44377</guid>
		<description>Tim, can you post Pink's arguments?

Thanks so much Charlie for your thoughts.  I hope my latest post on sanctification touched on some of the things you are reflecting on.  Grudem's quote helps much.  We must always remember that reprobation does not cause God to rejoice.  (However, some of Edwards' disciples used to teach that God is glorified through hell and reprobation which is a whole other discussion.)  

I think we must never lose sight of what Peterson calls "double agency" with what he would call and order of ultimacy.  Scripture teaches God's sovereignty fully and completely.  Scripture also teaches human responsibility.  In this sense there are two agents, God and man.  Both are concurrent, and both respond.  However, there is an order of ultimacy (which would protect against synergism (dual-action of God and man needed for salvation)).  God is ultimate and man is pen-ultimate.  How this all fits perfectly together must rest in the mystery of God (Isa 55:8-9).  To 'figure this out' perfectly would be like figuring out the Trinity perfectly or the incarnation perfectly.  We are told Scriptural truths that God has given to us and we're asked to believe them, to do what we can to understand them in light of our finiteness, but in the end we some things must be left to God (Paul's potter and clay argument in Romans 9).  Without this leaving to God, we would be like God (the Tower of Babel hubris).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, can you post Pink&#8217;s arguments?</p>
<p>Thanks so much Charlie for your thoughts.  I hope my latest post on sanctification touched on some of the things you are reflecting on.  Grudem&#8217;s quote helps much.  We must always remember that reprobation does not cause God to rejoice.  (However, some of Edwards&#8217; disciples used to teach that God is glorified through hell and reprobation which is a whole other discussion.)  </p>
<p>I think we must never lose sight of what Peterson calls &#8220;double agency&#8221; with what he would call and order of ultimacy.  Scripture teaches God&#8217;s sovereignty fully and completely.  Scripture also teaches human responsibility.  In this sense there are two agents, God and man.  Both are concurrent, and both respond.  However, there is an order of ultimacy (which would protect against synergism (dual-action of God and man needed for salvation)).  God is ultimate and man is pen-ultimate.  How this all fits perfectly together must rest in the mystery of God (Isa 55:8-9).  To &#8216;figure this out&#8217; perfectly would be like figuring out the Trinity perfectly or the incarnation perfectly.  We are told Scriptural truths that God has given to us and we&#8217;re asked to believe them, to do what we can to understand them in light of our finiteness, but in the end we some things must be left to God (Paul&#8217;s potter and clay argument in Romans 9).  Without this leaving to God, we would be like God (the Tower of Babel hubris).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimK</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44375</link>
		<dc:creator>TimK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44375</guid>
		<description>Charlie, I just read your posts again. Thanks for sharing! Also, the quote from Grudem/ST is excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, I just read your posts again. Thanks for sharing! Also, the quote from Grudem/ST is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44372</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44372</guid>
		<description>i didn't intend to make it sound like the criminal that did receive Jesus' invitation did NOT deserve it...or that somehow God let him narrowly slide into heaven...of course, NO ONE deserves such mercy...i think there is much to be said about the glory of God through the two criminals...(for some reason, i wanted to add that in as i read my previous comment :)

i think it would be humbling to seek out the criminal in heaven and see how passionately he is worshipping God :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t intend to make it sound like the criminal that did receive Jesus&#8217; invitation did NOT deserve it&#8230;or that somehow God let him narrowly slide into heaven&#8230;of course, NO ONE deserves such mercy&#8230;i think there is much to be said about the glory of God through the two criminals&#8230;(for some reason, i wanted to add that in as i read my previous comment <img src='http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i think it would be humbling to seek out the criminal in heaven and see how passionately he is worshipping God <img src='http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimK</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44363</link>
		<dc:creator>TimK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44363</guid>
		<description>Sam and Charlie - AW Pink is good on this, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam and Charlie - AW Pink is good on this, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44344</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/11/07/thoughts-on-election-part-2-reprobation/#comment-44344</guid>
		<description>thanks sam....lots of good stuff here...grudem's "systematic theology" also makes a reference to the book of jude, which i thought was a NT "gem" on this topic...


another section from grudem (p. 686):
"We must also remember that there are important differences between election and reprobation as they are presented in the Bible. Election to salvation is viewed as a cause for rejoicing and praising to God, who is worthy of praise and receives all the credit for our salvation (see Eph 1:3-6; 1 Pet 1:1-3) God is viewed as actively choosing us for salvation, and doing so in love and with delight. But reprobation is viewed as something that brings God sorrow, not delight (see Ezek 33:11), and the blame for the condemnation of sinners is always put on the people or angels who rebel, never on God himself (see John 3:18-19, 5:40)."


psalm 136 should remind us that God is love...it is the human heart that clings to a sense of entitlement of our own lives and the eternal destinies of our souls, that finds fault in the idea of reprobation...we/i tend to view God as somehow cruel and unjust to "deny" some people access into the gates of heaven...and i think ultimately, for the believer, election/reprobation shouldn't be viewed simply as whether someone makes it heaven or not (even though that is  the reality of God's calling and our final destination), but rather, how one responds to the message of the gospel in this life that we are given on earth...the two criminals on the crosses next to Christ might be a good example...although one of the two criminals was elected for salvation by the Almighty Creator before the beginning of the world, it wasn't until the day of his funeral that he was saved...he spent his entire life trampling on the glory of God...that is not how i would want to approach the throne of grace at the end of my earthly life...God is love, and his love and mercy and grace have rescued me from myself...i want/need to embrace that whole-heartedly today and everyday...i am incrementally understanding that his love and mercy and grace (and justice and power and glory...) can be best understood and displayed when not everyone is elected to salvation...if Christ promised both criminals that they would be with Him in paradise, there would be something fundamentally wrong with the message of the gospel...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks sam&#8230;.lots of good stuff here&#8230;grudem&#8217;s &#8220;systematic theology&#8221; also makes a reference to the book of jude, which i thought was a NT &#8220;gem&#8221; on this topic&#8230;</p>
<p>another section from grudem (p. 686):<br />
&#8220;We must also remember that there are important differences between election and reprobation as they are presented in the Bible. Election to salvation is viewed as a cause for rejoicing and praising to God, who is worthy of praise and receives all the credit for our salvation (see Eph 1:3-6; 1 Pet 1:1-3) God is viewed as actively choosing us for salvation, and doing so in love and with delight. But reprobation is viewed as something that brings God sorrow, not delight (see Ezek 33:11), and the blame for the condemnation of sinners is always put on the people or angels who rebel, never on God himself (see John 3:18-19, 5:40).&#8221;</p>
<p>psalm 136 should remind us that God is love&#8230;it is the human heart that clings to a sense of entitlement of our own lives and the eternal destinies of our souls, that finds fault in the idea of reprobation&#8230;we/i tend to view God as somehow cruel and unjust to &#8220;deny&#8221; some people access into the gates of heaven&#8230;and i think ultimately, for the believer, election/reprobation shouldn&#8217;t be viewed simply as whether someone makes it heaven or not (even though that is  the reality of God&#8217;s calling and our final destination), but rather, how one responds to the message of the gospel in this life that we are given on earth&#8230;the two criminals on the crosses next to Christ might be a good example&#8230;although one of the two criminals was elected for salvation by the Almighty Creator before the beginning of the world, it wasn&#8217;t until the day of his funeral that he was saved&#8230;he spent his entire life trampling on the glory of God&#8230;that is not how i would want to approach the throne of grace at the end of my earthly life&#8230;God is love, and his love and mercy and grace have rescued me from myself&#8230;i want/need to embrace that whole-heartedly today and everyday&#8230;i am incrementally understanding that his love and mercy and grace (and justice and power and glory&#8230;) can be best understood and displayed when not everyone is elected to salvation&#8230;if Christ promised both criminals that they would be with Him in paradise, there would be something fundamentally wrong with the message of the gospel&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
