<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wayne Grudem&#8217;s Vote Is for Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/#comment-43088</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/#comment-43088</guid>
		<description>big-time rebuttal to Wayne Grudem on http://www.daveolesen.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big-time rebuttal to Wayne Grudem on <a href="http://www.daveolesen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.daveolesen.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimK</title>
		<link>http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/#comment-42872</link>
		<dc:creator>TimK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2007/10/22/wayne-grudems-vote-is-for-mitt-romney/#comment-42872</guid>
		<description>Sam, you ask "who am I to disagree with such a reputed theologian". I think we can and should respectfully disagree with theologians when (1) their theology veers from God's Word and (2) their attempts to apply their theology veers from God's Word. I am thankful for Dr Grudem; his ST is the only one I currently own and I recommend it highly. However, I too would take issue with some of his political positions including the one you highlight here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, you ask &#8220;who am I to disagree with such a reputed theologian&#8221;. I think we can and should respectfully disagree with theologians when (1) their theology veers from God&#8217;s Word and (2) their attempts to apply their theology veers from God&#8217;s Word. I am thankful for Dr Grudem; his ST is the only one I currently own and I recommend it highly. However, I too would take issue with some of his political positions including the one you highlight here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
